The latter is what I was aiming for, given the current setup. The problem that I see with the first option is that CM would acquire an elitist image, like we're so cool so we'll let you come in here, post your ideas, and let us do the hard thinking. That's not the way to go... My thought was to do it without even informing the authors about it per se. We just find an idea to develop, discuss it here, and then simply post back the feedback. Don't know how effective that is, but judging from the way the Task Group Discussion sub-forum is shaping up, things will get hectic in there. In fact, I have a feeling it will revert to the same free-for-all that the other task discussion forums became, just with an added layer of (supposedly) collaborative quality control...